28411 Northwestern Hwy, 11th Floor, Southfield, MI 48034
Get Help Now!
Moss & Colella

Job Discrimination Lawyers in Michigan

Job Discrimination Lawyers in Michigan

Dedicated to Serving You

Unlawful discrimination in any work place can cause emotional as well as financial sufferings for the victim along with his or her family. If this has happened to you or a loved one, reach out to job discrimination lawyers to help fight against unlawful discrimination. 

Michigan State and Federal Employment Discrimination Laws

Employers are strictly prohibited from discriminating anyone in the workplace according to the United States Federal employment discrimination laws. The following factors include:

  • Age (40 years and older)
  • Citizenship status
  • National Orgin
  • Religion
  • Sex (which includes medical conditions, childbirth, or pregnancy)
  • Race
  • Genetic information
  • Physical disability

According to Michigan Law, it is illegal discriminate against both mental and physical disabilities. In addition to those, it is also prohibited to discriminate against marital status, a misdemeanor criminal record, AIDS or HIV, and height or weight.

How do I know if these Discrimination Rules Apply to my Employer?

Every company with one or more employees must follow the state’s anti-discrimination laws according to Michigan law. Any company that contains fifteen or more employees must follow Michigan’s Federal anti-discrimination law. However, there are certain exemptions that include:

  • Equal pay for men and women (applies to all employers)
  • Citizenship status discrimination (applies to all employers with four or more employees)
  • Age discrimination (employers with twenty or more employees)

In what Areas of Employment is Discrimination Prohibited

Discrimination in the factors listed above are forbidden in all of the following:

  • Promotion
  • Job assignment
  • Hiring
  • Testing
  • Compensation
  • Recruitment
  • Harassment
  • Termination

 The Federal law states that harassment in the workplace based on religion, color, disability, race, sex, national origin, age, or genetic information is strictly prohibited. Retaliation against any individual for filing a complaint on discrimination, participating in the investigation, or opposing any discriminatory practices are also forbidden.  Making employment decisions based on assumptions about the abilities, traits, or performance of any employee or a particular ethnic group, sex, or religion is illegal as well.

Denying employment opportunities based on marriage to individual of a certain race, religion, disability, or national origin is forbidden under Federal Law. According to Title VII, It is also illegal to discriminate based on participation in places of worship or schools connected to a particular religious group.

We want to help you fight this discrimination if you have faced any that is illegal under Federal or Michigan State law.

Sexual Harassment and Sex Discrimination
Pregnancy Discrimination
Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Who is Covered under FMLA?
Race Discrimination
Age Discrimination
Disability Discrimination
Religious Discrimination

Sexual Harassment and Sex Discrimination

Sexual harassment occurs when a man or women makes an unfriendly sexual advance which is considered illegal discrimination under Michigan Law. This unwanted act creates a very uncomfortable and hostile workplace for employees.

Legal Definition of Sexual Harassment in Michigan

There are two general categories of sexual harassment that are explained by Michigan’s Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act.

  •  Hostile work environment harassment
  •  “Quid pro quo” harassment

Sexual harassment means demands for sexual favors, unwanted sexual advances, physical or verbal conduct, or communication of a sexual nature when:

  1. To obtain employment, public housing, public education, or public services; a proposal of sexual conduct is made either indirectly or directly.
  2. An acceptance or rejection of a sexual conduct submission by an individual is used as a factor in deciding their employment, public accommodations, education, or housing.
  3. Sexual conduct has the effect of interfering with an individual’s employment, public education, housing, or public accommodations.

“Quid Pro Quo” Harassment

Quid Pro Quo is a Latin phrase meaning this for that; meaning the exchange between two parties. Any altercation that involves sexual activity in an employment setting is illegal under Michigan Law.

The most obvious form of harassment falls under the Quid Pro Quo harassment. An employee preforming demanded sexual favors for a boss/manager to receive a promotion would be an example.

Hostile Work Environment

Making a victim feel uncomfortable about their sexuality from words or actions is an example of hostile work environment sexual harassment. Even if there is no specific demand for a sexual favor, making a victim feel intimidated in their own work environment is harassment.

The harassment itself must be severe and persistent enough to file a claim.

The employer is solely responsible for the harm caused by a hostile work environment if the victim takes action about the harassment. The individual being harassed should report it in a timely manner to allow the employer adequate time to assess the situation. Complex legal issues arise with claims of hostile environments caused by sexual harassment.

Sexual harassment ranges from young to old, men to women, skilled and unskilled workers, and married to single people.

Types of sexual harassment include:

  • Women harassed by men
  • Women harassed by women
  • Men harassed by women
  • Men harassed by men

It is often unclear why one certain person is being harassed, but it is unacceptable and illegal.

Pregnancy Discrimination

Pregnant women are protected in the workplace by both federal and state laws in Michigan. Pregnancy is a unique condition that only applies to women, therefore any discrimination denies women’s rights because of their sex.

Michigan Law

Discrimination based on sex, including pregnancy, child birth, or medical conditions related to pregnancy is prohibited under the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. It is illegal to terminate a woman from the workplace due to a pregnancy.

Federal Law

The Pregnancy Discrimination Act is an amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which requires an employer to treat pregnancy the same as a form of medical leave.

A woman who is pregnant must follow the advice of her doctor, meaning the employer cannot make the decision about her maternity leave

Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)

Without losing their employment, The Family and Medical Leave Act enables workers to take an unpaid leave due to family and medical needs. Continuation of benefits and compliance is still required during their leave.

Protections and Rights

An employer must allow employees that are eligible up to 12 work-weeks of unpaid leave in a 12-month period according to FMLA to care for:

  • A newborn child
  • A newly-placed adopted or foster child
  • A seriously ill child, spouse or parent, or
  • An employee’s own serious health condition that prevents the individual from performing the functions of his or her job

The employer also must:

  • Continue the employee’s health coverage under any group health insurance plan, and
  • Restore the employee to his or her original job, or an equivalent position, upon return to work

The FMLA prevents an employer from:

  • Interfering with, restraining, or denying the exercise of any FMLA rights
  • Discharging, or discriminating against, any person for opposition to a practice prohibited by FMLA or for involvement in any proceeding related to FMLA

Who is Covered under FMLA?

Approximately 60% of Michigan workers are covered under this act. If they meet the following criteria they are eligible:

  • Must have worked for the employer for at least 52 weeks and at least 1,250 hours over the past 12 months
  • The employer has 50 or more employees who work within 75 miles of the work site.

FMLA applies to state, local, and federal agencies, as well as public and private employers.

Race Discrimination

Discrimination based on color, race, and national origin is strictly forbidden according to the Elliott- Larsen Civil Rights Act (ELCRA)

An employer must not refuse to hire or recruit, discharge, or otherwise discriminate against an individual with respect to employment, compensation, or a term, condition, or privilege of employment, because of . . . race, color, [or] national origin.”

Federal Racial Discrimination Law

Employers that are discriminated based on color, race, sex, national origin, or religion are protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The law only applied to companies with 15 or more employees which include local, federal, and state agencies as well as employment agencies and labor organizations.

Any employer who is discriminating an employee for job applications, promotions, compensation, and job training based on color or race is violating Title VII. Stereotypes or assumptions about abilities or performance cannot influence employment decisions. Also, an employer is forbidden to deny equal employment opportunities based on a person’s marriage or association to an individual of a different ethnicity or race.

Race- Related Characteristics and Conditions

Discrimination based on characteristics of an individual’s facial features, skin color, hair texture, or race is prohibited by federal law. An employer is prohibited to discriminate because of a condition that affects one particular race. Most employers can not exclude all individuals with sickle cell anemia; which predominantly affects African-Americans. However, these types of employment rules would be lawful, if and only if, the employer can show that different treatment for individuals with the condition is job-related and vital for business operations.


Racial jokes, offensive or negative comments, graffiti, pictures, ethnic slurs, or other comments based on race or color is considered harassment and violates Title VII. This harassment can cause an intimidating or uncomfortable work environment and can possibly interfere with an employee’s work performance.
Physically isolating or segregating workers from other employers because of a certain color or race is violating Title VII. It is forbidden for employers to not assign employees based on their color or race. Coding resumes or applications to designate an individual’s color or race is also considered discrimination.

Pre-Employment Inquiries

It is more than likely that if an employer asks an applicant information that indicates race or color that they will use that as a basis for hiring. This can be removed if minorities feel as though it is being used as discrimination. If an employer needs information about the color or race of an individual applying for affirmative action purposes, they can utilize “tear off sheets”.


Retaliating against anyone for filing for a discrimination charge, testifying in a Title VII investigation, or opposing discriminatory employment practices is prohibited.

Age Discrimination

An employer treats an individual less favorably because of their age is considered age discrimination, which is growing to be a major problem in America.

Michigan Law

The Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (ELCRA) prohibits discrimination based upon age. This law, MCL 37.2202, states:

“An employer must not refuse to hire or recruit, discharge, or otherwise discriminate against an individual with respect to employment, compensation, or a term, condition, or privilege of employment, because of . . . age.”

Fedral Law

Individuals who are 40 years or older are protected by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) from discrimination based on age. It is illegal to discriminate against an individual on privilege of employment, hiring, firing, lay off compensation, benefits, or promotions because of their age.  The ADEA applies to all employees as well as individuals applying. It is also prohibited for an employer to retaliate against an applicant for refusing employment practices that discriminate based on age or participating in an ADEA investigation based on the discrimination.

However, employers are permitted to force retirement on their employees based on their age in jobs such as firefighters and police officers.

The ADEA only pertains to employers that have 20 or more employees that includes state, federal and local governments, labor organizations, and employment agencies.


Any advertisement promoted by an employer that includes age limitations or preferences are strictly prohibited.

Pre-Employment Inquiries

Asking an applicant their date of birth is not prohibited, however, it may discourage older individuals applying for the position. The ADEA does not prohibit questions such as those but they are subject to close legal scrutiny. It is required that an employer has to show legitimate reasoning to know the age of the individual that is applying.


It is illegal to deny benefits to older workers under the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act of 1990 (OWBPA). However, an employer can potentially reduce benefits based on age, but only if the costs of the reduced benefits for older works is equal to the cost of regular benefits for younger workers.

Waivers of ADEA Rights

An individual may agree to give up the rights or claims under the ADEA at an employer’s request. A waiver agreement has to meet specific standards to be valid and enforceable. The following is the criteria the waiver must meet:

  • Be in writing and be comprehensible;
  • Specifically, refer to ADEA rights or claims;
  • Not waive rights or claims that may happen in the future;
  • Be in exchange for valuable deliberation;
  • Advise the individual in writing to consult an attorney before signing the waiver; and
  • Provide the individual at least 21 days to consider the agreement and at least 7 days to withdraw the agreement after signing it.

If an employer requests it in connection with an exit incentive or early retirement program, then the ADEA waiver will have stricter requirements.

Age Discrimination and Replacement of Higher-Wage Earners

It is illegal for an employer to replace workers making higher salary with workers that will make less based on their seniority. If ADEA took legal action, the employer would have to provide that the reason was truly age and not wages that motived the firing of older workers if they used wage rates as an excuse.

Disability Discrimination

Michigan Law

Any discrimination against an individual based on disability is strictly prohibited by the Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act (PWDCRA). The legal definition of disability is:

  • A mental or physical characteristic that is a result of an injury, disease, functional disorder, or congenital condition of birth.
  • If the characteristic limits one or more major life activity and is unrelated to the ability of the individual’s work performance

An individual is not protected by the PWDCRA if they lack the knowledge or skill to perform the job. However, they are covered if they possess a significant impairment that not only affects their work, but their day to day activities.

An employer must adjust for a worker with a disability under state law, unless doing so would create an unnecessary hardship. A worker must provide their employer with a written request for accommodation within 182 days of the worker learning the need for the accomendation.

Federal Law

Discriminating any employee with disabilities in job application procedures, advancement, hiring, firing, compensation, job training or other terms is forbidden under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

The ADA covers private employees that have 15 or more employees state and local governments, labor organizations, and employment agencies. ADA non-discrimination standards must also apply to federal government agencies under the federal Rehabilitation Act.

Under the ADA, an individual with a disability is a person who:

  • Has a mental or physical impairment that significantly limits one or more major life activities,
  • Has a record of impairment, or
  • Is viewed as having such an impairment.

An employee or applicant with a disability is considered qualified for a job, if he or she can perform the vital functions of that job, with or without reasonable accommodation.

A reasonable accommodation includes:

  • Making existing workplace facilities readily accessible to and usable by persons with a disability.
  • Rearrangement of a job, adjusting a work schedule, or reassigning to a available position.
  • Modifying equipment or devices, examinations, training materials, or policies, and providing qualified readers or interpreters.

An employer is not required to accommodate a worker that has a disability by lowering the production standards or quality or providing personal items.

Medical Examinations and Inquiries

The applicant may not be asked about the nature or severity of a disability by the employer, but they may be questioned about the ability to perform specific functions that the job requires. The medical examination must be job- related and the employer can make a job offer based on the results as long as all other employees receive the same examinations.

Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Employees who use illegal drugs and consume an excessive amount of alcohol are not covered by the ADA. An employer can hold alcoholics and drug users to the same performance standards as all the other employees.


Retaliating against any individual opposing employment that discriminates disability, filing a discrimination charge, or participating in an ADA investigation is prohibited.

Religious Discrimination

Michigan Law

Discrimination based on religion is prohibited under the Elliott- Larsen Civil Rights Act (ELCRA).

The law, MCL 37.2202, states:

“An employer must not refuse to hire or recruit, discharge, or otherwise discriminate against an individual with respect to employment, compensation, or a term, condition, or privilege of employment, because of religion.”

Federal Law

Employers discriminating against employees because of their religion is illegal under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This also includes hiring, firing, and other terms and conditions of employment. This law only pertains to employers with 15 or more employees including state, federal, and local government agencies, labor organization, and employment agencies.

Biased Treatment

Employees are not to be treated different by their employers based on their religious practices or beliefs. Employers may not hire or fire, give certain promotions, or impose different job performances based on religion. Also, it is forbidden that an employer forces an employee to participate, or not participate, in a religious activity.

Reasonable Accommodations

An employer is required to accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs or pratcies, unless it poses a threat or hardship to the employer. A reasonable adjustment should be made to allow an employee to practice his or her religious beliefs.

An employer might avoid interference with a worker’s beliefs or practices:

  • Flexible scheduling,
  • Voluntary job substitutions or swaps,
  • Job reassignments, lateral transfers, and
  • Changes in workplace practices, policies, or procedures.

However, an employer is not required to make an accommodation that could potentially interfere with the business or cause a hardship. An employer must provide legitimate proof that the employee’s religious practice would create a hardship for the business, require excessive costs, interfere with other jobs, cause safety hazards, or conflict with another law or regulation.

Religious Expression in the Workplace

An employee must receive permission from their employer to practice their religion at work, unless the religious expression can cause a problem within the workplace. It is prohibited that an employer places more restrictions on one religion over another.


Implementing anti-harassment policies are some efficient ways employers can prevent religious harassment of their employees. They can also create a effective procedure for reporting, investigating, and abolishing harassment.


It is illegal to retaliate against an employee for opposing employment that discriminates based on religion. It is also forbidden to retaliate on an employee for filing a discrimination charge, or for testifying or participating in a Title VII lawsuit.

Latest News

Read All News

Client's Testimonials

  • “Words can not express how grateful I am for the outcome of this case. It was truly a blessing to have this resolved sooner than expected. But without your help and my faith in your firm along with my faith on God, this may not have been possible. I appreciate everything you have done in orchestrating everything to this resolve, for your time and effort meant the world to me. I thank my friend for putting me in touch with such a talented group of people. You will always be considered my attorneys of choice for anything that comes up in the future that would render your services. This year has definitely been many blessings so far and I welcome many more to come. Thank you again for everything and may you continue to be blessed.”

    Mother of Client
  • “I am very relieved and very happy with the outcome. I appreciate everything you and your firm did to see this through and I will be grateful for that always. You all came highly recommended and now I see why based on what you did in helping my son through a very challenging moment in his life. We will always be your fans:) Thank you again and may you always be Blessed…”

    Mother of Client
  • I do not only count on you as one bad ass lawyer, but also a friend. None of this would be possible without you. My deepest gratitude to you, Vic and all of the Moss & Colella team.

    Actual Client
  • I just wanted to thank you for putting your time and effort into my case. You did a wonderful job last Thursday. You are what people say you are, a wonderful lawyer.

  • Very few people on this earth impress me. You are one of the very few. My family and I thank you for all you did. You are a good man!

  • Other law firms would not take my case, they said it was too complicated. But David Moss took my case and got the result I was looking for in almost no time at all. I’m glad I didn’t listen to those other lawyers.

    Actual Client

Request a call back?

Please fill out the form and press the submit button.
We will get back to you within 24-48 hours.

Call Now